Jip Van Assendelft vs Leonardo Mileikowsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Van Assendelft vs L. Mileikowsky

Jip Van Assendelft
NED
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
23
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Leonardo Mileikowsky
BEL
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
23
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Assendelft 1 - 0 Mileikowsky
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jip Van Assendelft winning 2 and Leonardo Mileikowsky winning 1. The last match between Jip Van Assendelft and Leonardo Mileikowsky was at the M25 Brussels, 24-06-2024, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Jip Van Assendelft getting the victory 6-3 4-6 10-7.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Assendelft | 1 |
Mileikowsky | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) M25 Brussels(06-24-24)
Jip Van Assendelft
6
4
10
Leonardo Mileikowsky
3
6
7
J. V. Assendelft vs L. Mileikowsky H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
50.79% (32-31) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (2-4) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. V. Assendelft vs L. Mileikowsky Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jip Van Assendelft has won 48.57% of points on their second serve, while Leonardo Mileikowsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jip Van Assendelft, in recent form, has won 49.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leonardo Mileikowsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jip Van Assendelft has saved 50.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leonardo Mileikowsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jip Van Assendelft has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/3), with Leonardo Mileikowsky winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jip Van Assendelft has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 20/16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/3). Leonardo Mileikowsky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 2/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Jip Van Assendelft has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/3), where as Leonardo Mileikowsky has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jip Van Assendelft winning 1 times and Leonardo Mileikowsky being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jip Van Assendelft winning 2 and Leonardo Mileikowsky winning 1.
- The last match between Jip Van Assendelft and Leonardo Mileikowsky was at the M25 Brussels, 24-06-2024, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Jip Van Assendelft getting the victory 6-3 4-6 10-7.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jip Van Assendelft has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.78 while Leonardo Mileikowsky has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jip Van Assendelft has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leonardo Mileikowsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jip Van Assendelft has converted 29.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leonardo Mileikowsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jip Van Assendelft vs Leonardo Mileikowsky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. V. Assendelft vs L. Mileikowsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
20 | Games Won | 16 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:48:0 | Average Match Time | 1:48:0 |
67% (49/73) | 1st Serve % | 62% (44/71) |
69% (34/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (29/44) |
46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
44% (31/71) | Return Points Win % | 38% (28/73) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Assendelft 51%, Mileikowsky 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Assendelft 53%, Mileikowsky 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Assendelft 55%, Mileikowsky 0%.
J. V. Assendelft Recent Matches Played
L. Mileikowsky Recent Matches Played

J. V. Assendelft vs L. Mileikowsky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.79% (32/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
50.33% (76/75) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
50.36% (766/755) | Games Win/Loss | 43.70% (59/76) |
47.62% (10/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
55.56% (20/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
50 | Aces Total | 1 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
131 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
191.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 118.5 |
61% (991/1618) | 1st Serve % | 67% (231/347) |
65% (644/991) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (141/231) |
47% (297/627) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (52/116) |
41% (65/157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (16/35) |
40% (642/1604) | Return Points Win % | 42% (144/341) |
50.79% (32/31) | Futures W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
51% (32/63) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
52% (13/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
74% (34/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
26% (34/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
24% (29/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
1.17
W2
5
06:00 PM 19/10/25
PredictionW1
1.21
W2
4.05
12:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
8.4
02:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
2.42
W2
1.56
03:30 PM 19/10/25
PredictionW1
2.16
W2
1.64
07:10 PM 19/10/25
PredictionW1
1.333
W2
3.1
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
19 Oct 2025
Damir Dzumhur vs Ethan Quinn Prediction – ATP Erste Bank Open – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Valentin Royer vs Kamil Majchrzak Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Hamad Medjedovic vs Jacob Fearnley Prediction – ATP Erste Bank Open – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Reilly Opelka vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Remy Bertola vs Quentin Halys Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Tristan Schoolkate vs Matteo Arnaldi Prediction – ATP Erste Bank Open – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
15:30
H2H 5-4
14:00
H2H 5-2
16:05
H2H 3-2
14:00
H2H 2-3
14:00
H2H 1-2
Tennis Events This Week
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
Erste Bank Open - Vienna
Austria
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel
Switzerland
Brest Challenger
France
Costa do Sauipe Challenger
Brazil
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hamburg Challenger
Germany
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Sioux Falls Challenger
United States
Suzhou Challenger
China
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tanagura
Japan
M15 Villers-les-Nancy
France
M25 Brisbane
Australia
M25 Huzhou
China
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sarreguemines
France
M25 Sheffield
Great Britain
M25 Sintra
Portugal